Purpose of Criminal Laws Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Purpose of Criminal Laws - Essay ExampleFor example, a child that fails to clean their dwell would receive punishment in the form of extra chores or loss of other things they normally enjoy. For venomous law, it is no different, except that the consequences of their actions involve a loss of privilege on a greater scale, much(prenominal) as by imprisonment or fines (Banks, 2009). Again, if on that point were no punishments, there would be no designer not to commit curses therefore, some type of consequences must be handed out. Criminal laws seek to heap consequences for and punish those that have carried out a crime by means of deterrence, as well as incapacitation, incarceration, restitution, and retribution. People are deterred from actions when they refrain from carrying them out because they fear or do not want the consequences that come on with the action (Banks, 2009). Criminal laws aids in this because they not only define what the laws are that cannot be lost but als o set out the punishment that each law brings with it. In a press out with a death penalty, for example, if person does not wish to be punished by death, they will not commit a crime that leads them down that path. Thus, the criminal laws have done their job both in setting out the action and the punishment for it, because it has kept people from committing crimes due to the consequences imposed. Though some mind the validity of deterrence and call for stiffer penalties in certain laws (Banks, 2009), the fact remains that deterrence is a crusade that criminal laws exist. Another reason that criminal laws exist is retribution. Simply put, retribution means that whoever has gone against the laws of party deserves to be punished, and it will bring a measure of peace, if not pleasure, to those that were wronged to see punishment happen. Systems of retribution for crime have long existed, with the best known being the Biblical proverb of an eye for an eye (Banks, 2009). small-arm r etribution is known to be confused with revenge, it has been pointed out in law and in argument that the contrariety between the two is very defined retribution involves limits set according to the seriousness of the wrongs done to society, whereas there is no limit to revenge (Banks, 2009). Take again the case of the criminal who chooses to murder and take a life in a state that has the death penalty. If convicted, they will pay with their own life by means of execution. One cannot argue that this is, in fact, an example of an eye for an eye logic in punishing someone who has done wrong. Criminal laws also exist to provide incapacitation and incarceration measures for those that choose to go against the laws of society. Incapacitation is a scheme of incarceration, arguing that some criminals need to be separated from society not only for what they index have done but also to protect those who have not done wrong from this individual. It is seen as a good punishment for those th at commit crimes because while they are incapacitated, or incarcerated